![]() Not an obnoxious amount, but enough to make me just say wow. All were excellent, but Gigapixel had a little extra sharpening that made it better than the original. Topaz Gigapixel AI 4.4.2 Single Image Resize UX. When birding, if I can't get close enough to fill the frame, then I'll run the image though Gigapixel x2 or even x4 and then crop to get much better results. Gigapixel 4.4.2 vs 4.7.1 Performance Analysis. If you are going to need to heavily crop, then Gigapixel is well worth the money. Due to installing a new graphic card, I need to re-install the latest version of GigaPixel which. There were times when I thought camera shake was the issue, but, say, out of focus provided better results, so there is trial and error with Topaz as well. Hi all, got a question about installing GigaPixel (again). ![]() With Topaz it's a good idea to try all their models for sharpening (standard, blur, out of focus, too soft) to see which one provides the best results. Topaz sharpen is excellent If the focus is off a bit, or there was some subject movement, camera shake or the image is just soft, but again PS is pretty good at it as well, just a lot more trial and error using different tools in PS. If just a part of the photo is noisy, like a dark background, then I find masking using layers in PS and applying noise reduction to the masked, noisy area works better than using Topaz DeNoise on the entire photo. If I had to crank up the ISO and noise is an issue, then Topaz DeNoise does a very nice job, although the noise reduction tools in PS are very good as well. For my workflow, if the image is sharp and low noise, the tools provided in LrC are all that's needed. The Topaz suite is excellent, but as with all tools, it has it's limitations. #3 is the DeNoised version, while #4 is the final processed but NOT denoised, not in Lightroom or otherwise.Ĭamera, Sony A6400 with 18-105 f/4 zoom, 1/125 sec F/5.6, ISO 12,800.Sorry, can't help you with Affinity Photo 2, but have the Topaz Suite and use it with the Adobe LrC and PS. The square crops emphasize the difference. When a picture needs only good denoising and a little extra sharpening, DeNoise is still king. I honestly hope that if Topaz ultimately intends to go all-in on Photo AI that they make it selectable. That was all that was needed, and batched through the whole thing in half an hour or so. Except for gnarly noise, they were otherwise fine, so I tried true and trusty DeNoise AI. It did a fine job but took a long time and I had 160 images to finish. ![]() Processing, I culled down to the keepers and took one into Photo AI. I have a flash and know how to use it, but I hate the look and would rather tame some noise than destroy the look of the ambient. Huge room, hundred or more people, entertainers, speeches, awards. I shamelessly shoot at 6400 and higher when needed, and I use half-frame APS-C cameras so things can get a little noisy. I am impressed with all of them, but I only use Photo AI when I need what it offers, It is indeed an amalgam of the earlier three, but it has some issues yet, one being that it is doing so much at once that it's slower. Personally, I like retaining the control that DeNoise AI gives me. If Photo AI comes out on top, does it make DeNoise AI entirely redundant? And if DeNoise AI wins, does it mean Topaz Labs has wasted its time on the new Photo AI? Give the video a look and let me know your thoughts. Whatever the result, you can only deduce that there must be some form of cannibalization going on. It's a fascinating experiment, simply because it's putting a company's products up against each other. That brings us to this great video by Anthony Morganti, in which he puts the new Photo AI up against DeNoise AI, to see which one works better at noise removal. It sounds amazing, but how does it compare when used against its own individual products? ![]() Very recently, however, Topaz Labs released Photo AI, which is an all-in-one software that removes noise, sharpens, and increases resolution with a single click. If you bought them as a bundle, you still had to use them independently of each other. You could (and still can) buy them all separately, or buy them as part of a bundle. The first two are self-explanatory in what they do, while Gigapixel AI adds resolution to an image, which can really help if you want to print an image at large sizes. Until a short time ago, Topaz Labs' products were separate, in that you had DeNoise AI, Sharpen AI, and Gigapixel AI. If you're not familiar with Topaz Labs' editing products, for a long while now they've been up towards the top of the tree for correcting noise in an image and sharpening as well.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |